Propaganda debunks / Palestine
The First Revolt lasted seven years, 66 to 73 CE, not three
The claim
“After the first, which it took the Romans three years to put down, Rome destroyed the temple.”Made by C.S. Friedman (public figure, Science fiction and fantasy novelist).
Where it was posted: Quora, in an answer by C.S. Friedman
What the evidence shows
The evidence shows the claim is wrong.
The First Revolt ran 66 to 73, that’s seven years, not three. Jerusalem fell in 70, Masada in 73. If you mean “three years to take Jerusalem,” it started in 66, so that’s four. Either way “three” is wrong.
Inside of the besieged Jerusalem, three Jewish factions (John of Gischala, Simon bar Giora, Eleazar ben Simon), were fighting. While Titus was at the gate of Jerusalem, the Jews continued their 3 way fight and burnt the food stores in their own city. Josephus, an eyewitness, says it. Tacitus confirms three armies in the city. The factions torched the grain to force everyone to fight instead of negotiate, and the population starved as a result. The clean heroic-resistance picture you’re painting is not what the sources describe.
Her line “All of that involved facing off against Roman soldiers, not raping Roman women and burning babies alive” has no source. Rome crucified 500 people a day outside Jerusalem’s walls under Josephus, the very period you chose to use. Rome enslaved women and children en masse. Titus’s siege razed the city.
First published in my Quora debunk archive.
Evidence
Book 5, 1.4: the factions burn the grain stores; book 5, 11.1: up to 500 crucified a day; book 7: Masada, 73 CE.
Book 5, 12: three leaders and three armies inside the besieged city.
Review
0 endorse, 0 challenge. Upheld at 3+ endorsements outnumbering challenges 2 to 1, after 24 hours open.
Sign in or create an account to review this debunk.
Debates
No debate on this debunk yet.